Sunday, July 26, 2009
C , C++ Interview Questions Part-6
Interview FAQs : C++ (Answers End of Post)
1) Which is the parameter that is added to every non-static member function when it is called?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2)
class base
{
public:
int bval;
base(){ bval=0;}
};
class deri:public base
{
public:
int dval;
deri(){ dval=1;}
};
void SomeFunc(base *arr,int size)
{
for(int i=0; i <>bval;
cout << endl; } int main() { base BaseArr[5]; SomeFunc(BaseArr,5); deri DeriArr[5]; SomeFunc(DeriArr,5); }
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3)
class base { public: void baseFun(){ cout << "from base" <<>baseFun();
}
int main()
{
base baseObject;
SomeFunc(&baseObject);
Deri deriObject;
SomeFunc(&deriObject);
}
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4)
class base
{
public:
virtual void baseFun(){ cout << "from base" <<>baseFun();
}
int main()
{
base baseObject;
SomeFunc(&baseObject);
Deri deriObject;
SomeFunc(&deriObject);
}
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5)
class some
{
public:
~some()
{
cout << "some's destructor" << endl; } }; void main() { some s; s.~some(); } ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6) #include class fig2d { int dim1; int dim2; public: fig2d() { dim1=5; dim2=6;} virtual void operator<<(ostream & rhs); }; void fig2d::operator<<(ostream &rhs) { rhs <<>dim1 <<" "<
}
*/
void main()
{
fig2d obj1;
// fig3d obj2;
obj1 << cout; // obj2 << cout; }
return true;
else
return false;
}
int main()
{
complex c1;
cout << c1;
}
Class complex
{
double re;
double im;
public:
complex() : re(0),im(0) {}
complex(double n) { re=n,im=n;};
complex(int m,int n) { re=m,im=n;}
void print() { cout << re; cout << im;}
};
void main()
{
complex c3;
double i=5;
c3 = i;
c3.print();
}
00000
2. 01010
3. from base
from base
4. from base
from Derived
5. some's destructor
some's destructor
6. 5 6
7. Runtime Error: Stack Overflow
8. Garbage value
9. 5,5
C Language Optimisations part-2
C Language Optimisations part-1
Never use two loops where one will suffice:
for(i=0; i<100; i++)
{
stuff();
}
for(i=0; i<100; i++)
{
morestuff();
}
It would be better to do:
for(i=0; i<100; i++)
{
stuff();
morestuff();
}
Note, however, that if you do a lot of work in the loop, it might not fit into your processor's instruction cache. In this case, two separate loops may actually be faster as each one can run completely in the cache.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Faster for() loops
Simple but effective.
Ordinarily, you would code a simple for() loop like this:
for( i=0; i<10; i++){ ... }
i loops through the values 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9
If you don't care about the order of the loop counter, you can do this instead:
for( i=10; i--; ) { ... }
Using this code, i loops through the values 9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1,0, and the loop should be faster.
This works because it is quicker to process "i--" as the test condition, which says "is i non-zero? If so, decrement it and continue.".
For the original code, the processor has to calculate "subtract i from 10. Is the result non-zero? if so, increment i and continue.". In tight loops, this make a considerable difference.
The syntax is a little strange, put is perfectly legal. The third statement in the loop is optional (an infinite loop would be written as "for( ; ; )" ). The same effect could also be gained by coding:
for(i=10; i; i--){}
or (to expand it further)
for(i=10; i!=0; i--){}
The only things you have to be careful of are remembering that the loop stops at 0 (so if you wanted to loop from 50-80, this wouldn't work), and the loop counter goes backwards.It's easy to get caught out if your code relies on an ascending loop counter.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
switch() instead of if...else...
For large decisions involving if...else...else..., like this:
if( val == 1)
dostuff1();
else if (val == 2)
dostuff2();
else if (val == 3)
dostuff3();
it may be faster to use a switch:
switch( val )
{
case 1: dostuff1(); break;
case 2: dostuff2(); break;
case 3: dostuff3(); break;
}
In the if() statement, if the last case is required, all the previous ones will be tested first. The switch lets us cut out this extra work. If you have to use a big if..else.. statement, test the most likely cases first.
C++ Portability Rules Part - 3
C++ Portability Rules Part - 2
C++ Portability Rules Part - 1
C++ Interview Questions Part-5
C ,C++ Interview Questions Part-4
C ,C++ Interview Questions Part-3
C ,C++ Interview Questions Part-2
C ,C++ Interview Questions Part-1
RSS Feed
Twitter
Orkut